Variación temporal del ensamblaje de mariposas asociadas a la Cuenca de la Calaboza, Yopal, Casanare, Colombia (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.745Keywords:
Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Piedmont, community, diversity, conservation, ColombiaAbstract
Temporal variation can affect the structure of the habitat and the availability of resources, which can generate different responses of animal species such as butterflies. For this reason, we were proposed to evaluate the effect of the temporal variation in the assembly of butterflies in the Calaboza, Casanare, Colombia, having two sampling periods: Low Rains and High Rains and using active and passive collection methods proposed for the study of butterflies. It was possible to show a variation in the composition, abundance and richness of butterflies throughout the sampling, where the Nymphalidae family presented greater diversity for both the High and Low Rainy seasons followed by Pieridae family. On the other hand, Lycaenidae and Riodinidae presented the lowest values of abundance and wealth in both sampling seasons. A variation in the composition of the butterflies species was observed by sampling period, where Pyrgus orcus (Stoll, 1780), Memphis ambrosia (Druce, 1874), Eresia clara (Linnaeus, 1758), Cissia tiessa (Doubleday, 1848), Euptoieta claudia (Cramer, 1775), Taygetis rufomarginata (Staudinger, 1888), Aphrissa statira (Cramer, 1777), Melete polyhymnia (Felder & Felder, 1865) and Hypoleria ocalea (Doubleday, 1847), were exclusive of low rains period, while Pyrgus oileus (Linnaeus, 1767), Eueides lybia (Fabricius, 1775), Itaballia demophile (Linnaeus, 1763), Dircenna dero (Hübner, 1823), Hamadryas arinome (Lucas, 1853), Taygetis andromeda (Butler, 1877), Eunica malvina (Bates, 1864), Posttaygetis penelea (Cramer, 1777), among others, were exclusive species of the High Rainy season. We were evidenced that species such as Historis acheronta (Fabricius, 1775) and Heliconius erato (Linnaeus, 1758) were co-dominant for both the Low season and the High Rainy season. These results indicate that there are ecosystem conditions that support the biological requirements for the survival of the butterflies’ community, despite the specific nature of the presence of some species by climate season; a high diversity of species is reported. Important study area for the ecosystem equilibrium, so the Calaboza becomes an area of importance for conservation at piedmont level in the region of the Colombian Orinoquia.
Downloads
References
ANDRADE-C., M. G., 2011.– Estado del conocimiento de la Biodiversidad en Colombia y sus amenazas. Consideraciones para fortalecer la interacción ciencia-política.– Revista Academia Colombiana de Ciencias, 35(137): 491-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.35(137).2011.2424
ANDRADE-C., M. G., HENAO-BAÑOL, E. R. & TRIVIÑO, P., 2013.– Técnicas y procesamiento para la recolección, preservación y montaje de mariposas en estudios de biodiversidad y conservación (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea).– Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias, 37(144): 311-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.12
BAPTISTE, M. P., CASTAÑO, N., CÁRDENAS, L. D., GUTIÉRREZ, F. P., GIL, D. L. & LASSO, C. A., 2010.– Análisis de riesgo y propuesta de categorización de especies introducidas para Colombia: 56 pp. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, D. C.
BROWN, Jr. K. S., 1991.– Conservation of Neotropical paleoenvironments: Insects as indicators.– In N. M. COLLINS & J. A. THOMAS (Eds). Conservation of Insects and their Habitats: 349-404. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-181370-3.50020-8
CASAS-PINILLA, L. C., MAHECHA-J., O., DUMAR-R., J. C. & RÍOS-MÁLAVER, I. C., 2017.– Diversidad de mariposas en un paisaje de bosque seco tropical, en la Mesa de los Santos, Santander, Colombia (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea).– SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, 45(177); 83-108.
CODESIDO, M. & BILENCA, D. N., 2004.– Variación estacional de un ensamble de aves en un bosque subtropical semiárido del Chaco Argentino.– Biotropica, 36: 544-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2004.tb00349.x
DURÁN, E., BALVANERA, P., LOTT, E., SEGURA, G., PÉREZ-JIMÉNEZ, A., ISLAS, Á. & FRANCO, M., 2002.– Estructura, composición y dinámica de la vegetación.– In F. A. NOGUERA, J. H. VEGA-RIVERA, A. N. GARCÍA-ALDRETE & M. QUESADA-AVENDAÑO (eds.). Historia Natural de Chamela: 443-472. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
FAGUA, G., AMARILLO, A. & ANDRADE-C., M. G., 1999.– Mariposas (Lepidoptera) como bioindicadores del grado de intervención en la cuenca del río Pato (Caquetá).– In M. G. ANDRADE, G. AMAT & F. FERNÁNDEZ (eds). Insectos de Colombia: 285-315. Estudios Escogidos. Colección Jorge Álvarez Lleras. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Bogotá.
GONZÁLEZ-VALDIVIA, N., OCHOA-GAONA, S., POZO, C., FERGUSON, F. G., RANGEL-RUIZ, L. J., ARRIAGA-WEISS, S. L., PONCE-MENDOZA, A. & KAMPICHLER, C., 2011.– Indicadores ecológicos de hábitat y biodiversidad en un paisaje Neotropical: perspectiva multi-taxonómica.– Revista Biología Tropical, 59(3): 1433- 451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v0i0.3409
GUERRA-SERRUDO, J. F. & LEDEZMA-ÁRIAS, J., 2008.– Biología y morfología de Morpho menelaus godartii (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Morphinae) en el Parque Nacional Cotapata Bolivia.– Ecología en Bolivia, 43(1): 40-52.
GREENEY, H. F., PYRCZ, T. W, DEVRIES, P. J. & DYER, L. A., 2009.– The early stages of Pedaliodes poesia (Hewitson, 1862) in eastern Ecuador (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae: Pronophilini).– Journal of Insect Science, 9: 1-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1673/031.009.3801
IBM-SPSS Inc. Released 2008.– SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. ISERHARD, C. A., PICCOLI-ROMANOWSKI, H., RICHTER, A. & MILTON DE SOUZA MENDONÇA, JR., 2017.– Monitoring Temporal Variation to Assess Changes in the Structure of Subtropical Atlantic Forest Butterfly Communities.– Environmental Entomology, 46(4): 804-813. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvx115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvx115
JOST, L., 2006.– Entropy and diversity.– Oikos, 113: 363-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
KATO, M., INOUE, T., HAMID, A. A., NAGAMITSU, T., MERDEK, M. B., NONA, A. R., ITINO, T., YAMANE, S. & YUMOTO, T., 1995.– Seasonality and vertical structure of light-attracted insect communities in a dipterocarp forest in Sarawak.– Researches on Population Ecology, 37: 59-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515762
LAMAS, G., 2004.– Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera, Checklist: Part 4A, Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea: 439 pp. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera, Gainesville.
LE CROM, J. F., CONSTANTINO, L. M. & SALAZAR, J. A., 2002.– Mariposas de Colombia. Papilionidae, 1: 119 pp. Carlec Ltda. Bogotá.
LE CROM, J. F, CONSTANTINO, L. M. & SALAZAR, J. A., 2004.– Mariposas de Colombia. Pieridae, 2: 113 pp. Carlec Ltda. Bogotá.
MAGURRAN, A. E., 2011.– Measuring biological diversity in time (and space): 85-96.– In A. E. MAGURRAN & B. J. MCGILL (eds.). Biological Diversity: Frontiers in measurement and assessment: 368 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
MAHECHA-JIMÉNEZ, O. J., DUMAR-RODRÍGUEZ, J. C. & PYRCZ T. W., 2011.- Efecto de la fragmentación del hábitat sobre las comunidades de Lepidoptera de la tribu Pronophilini a lo largo de un gradiente altitudinal en un bosque andino en Bogotá (Colombia) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae).– SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, 39(153): 117-126.
MAHECHA-J., O. & DÍAZ-S., V., 2015.– Aproximación a la diversidad taxonómica de las mariposas diurnas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) en la Vereda Cafrería, Municipio Icononzo, Tolima.– Revista Científica Unincca, 20(2): 83-91.
MCALEECE, N., GAGE, J. D. G., LAMBSHEAD, P. J. D. & PATERSON, G. L. J., 1997.– Biodiversity Professional statistics analysis software. Jointly developed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum, London.
MORENO, C. E., 2001.– Métodos para medir la biodiversidad: 84 pp. Manuales y Tesis, Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, Zaragoza.
MORENO, C. E., BARRAGÁN, F., PINEDA, E. & PAVÓN, N. P., 2011.– Reanálisis de la diversidad alfa: alternativas para interpretar y comparar información sobre comunidades ecológicas.– Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 82: 1249-1261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2011.4.745
NAUJOKAITIS-LEWIS, I. & FORTIN, M. J., 2016.– Spatio-temporal variation of biotic factors underpins contemporary range dynamics of congeners.– Global change biology, 22(3): 1201-1213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13145
NEILD, A., 1996.– The butterflies of Venezuela. Nymphalidae I (Limenitidinae, Apaturinae, Charaxinae), 1: 144 pp. Meridian Publications, Greenwich, London.
NEILD, A., 2008.– The butterflies of Venezuela. Nymphalidae II (Acraeinae, Libytheinae, Nymphalinae, Ithomiinae and Morphinae), 2: 144 pp. Meridian Publications Greenwich, London.
NOGUERA, F. A., CHEMSAK, J. A., ZARAGOZA–CABALLERO, S., RODRÍGUEZ-PALAFOX, A., RAMÍREZGARCÍA, E., GONZÁLEZ-SORIANO, E. & AYALA, R., 2007.– A faunal study of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) from one region with tropical dry forest in Mexico: San Buenaventura, Jalisco.– The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 83: 296-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3956/2007-14.1
PESCADOR-RUBIO, A., RODRÍGUEZ-PALAFOX, A. & NOGUERA, F. A., 2002.– Diversidad y estacionalidad de Arthropoda.– In F. A. NOGUERA, J. H. VEGA-RIVERA, A. N. GARCÍA–ALDRETE & M. QUESADAAVENDAÑO (eds.). Historia Natural de Chamela: 183-201. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
RIBEIRO, D. B., WILLIAMS, M. R., SPECHT, A. & FREITAS, A. V., 2016.– Vertical and temporal variability in the probability of detection of fruit-feeding butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) in tropical forest.– Austral Entomology, 55(1): 112-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12157
ROMERO, M., GALINDO, G., OTERO, J. & ARMENTERAS, D., 2004.– Ecosistemas de la cuenca del Orinoco Colombiano: 189 pp. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt. Bogotá.
RUDAS, G., DARWIN, M., ARMENTERAS, D., RODRÍGUEZ, N., MORALES, M., DELGADO, L. C. & SARMIENTO, A., 2007.– Biodiversidad y actividad humana: relaciones en ecosistemas de bosque subandino en Colombia: 128-130 pp. Instituto de Investigación de recursos biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá.
SANTOS, T. & TELLERÍA, J. L., 2006.– Pérdida y fragmentación del hábitat: efecto sobre la conservación de las especies.– Ecosistemas, 15(2): 3-12
SHAPIRO, A. M., VANBUSKIRK, R., KAREOFELAS, G. & PATTERSON, W. D., 2003.– Phenophaunistics: Seasonality as a property of butterfly faunas: 111-148.– In C. L. BOGGS, W. B. WATT & P. EHRLICH (eds). Butterflies: ecology and evolution taken flight: 756 pp. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
URBANO, P., MAHECHA, J. O. & HINCAPIE, E., 2014.– Diversidad y estructura de las comunidades de Lepidoptera en la zona de ecotono entre el piedemonte llanero y sabana inundable en Casanare-Colombia (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea).– SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, 167(42): 433-437.
VAN DER HAMMEN, T. & ANDRADE, G., 2003.– Estructura Ecológica Principal de Colombia (primera aproximación): 74 pp. Ministerio de Ambiente e Ideam, Bogotá,Colombia.
WARREN, D., DAVIS, J., STANGELAND, M., PELHAM, J. & GRISHIN, N., 2013.– Illustrated Lists of American Butterflies. Disponible en http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/ (accedido el 18 de mayo de 2017).
WOLDA, H., 1978.– Fluctuations in abundance of tropical insects.– The American Naturalist, 112: 1017-1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/283344
ZAR, J. H., 1996.– Biostatistical analysis: 663 pp. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
ZARAGOZA-CABALLERO, S., NOGUERA, F. A., CHEMSAK, J. A., GONZÁLEZ-SORIANO, E., RODRÍGUEZPALAFOX, A., RAMÍREZ-GARCÍA, E. & AYALA, R., 2003.– Diversity of Lycidae, Phengodidae, Lampyridae, and Cantharidae (Coleoptera) in a tropical dry forest region in Mexico: Sierra de Huautla, Morelos.– The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 7: 3-37.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 P. Urbano, O. Mahecha-J., E. Suárez, V. Izquierdo, V. Díaz-S.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author SS retains his trademark and patent rights to any process or procedure within the article.
The author retains the right to share, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the article published in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, with initial acknowledgement of its publication in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
The author retains the right to make a subsequent publication of his work, from using the article to publishing it in a book, provided that he indicates its initial publication in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Each submission to SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología must be accompanied by an acceptance of copyright and acknowledgement of authorship. By accepting them, authors retain copyright of their work and agree that the article, if accepted for publication by SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, will be licensed for use and distribution under a "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" (CC BY 4.0) licence that allows third parties to share and adapt the content for any purpose giving appropriate credit to the original work.
You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
As of 2022, the content of the print and digital version is licensed under a "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" (CC BY 4.0), licence that allows third parties to share and adapt the content for any purpose giving appropriate credit to the original work.
Previous content in the journal was published under a traditional copyright licence; however, the archive is available for free access.
When using the contents of SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología published before 2022, including figures, tables or any other material in printed or electronic format belong to the authors of the articles, the authors must obtain the permission of the copyright holder. Legal, financial and criminal liabilities in this respect belong to the author(s).
In application of the Principle of Priority of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, no other version than the one published by the publisher may be deposited in repositories, personal websites or similar.