Variation in hindwing size and shape of Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.338Parole chiave:
Lepidoptera, Plutellidae, morfometría geométrica, insectos plaga, taxonomía, VenezuelaAbstract
Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) has been claimed to be the most widely distributed Lepidoptera species. However, it is a highly polymorphic species, and there is evidence that what is known as P. xylostella is a species group, so it is possible that all records do not correspond to this species. Aim of the work was to evaluate the variability of hindwing size and shape of Venezuelan P. xylostella specimens and explore possible differentiation between groups of individuals. For this purpose, 126 specimens belonging to the entomological collections of the Museo del Instituto de Zoología Agrícola Francisco Fernández Yépez (MIZA, Central University of Venezuela) and the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrícolas (INIA), were sampled. Variation patterns of wing size and shape were studied by means of landmark-based geometric morphometrics. The analysis revealed significant differences in wing shape between three groups separated by differences observed in the bifurcation of the M vein. These differences may be due to intra- or interspecific variation; there is not enough evidence to discern. In Venezuela, there are three morphotypes of P. xylostella, separated based on differences in shape and size of their hindwings. It is important to clarify the identity of these morphotypes by combining these results with further information such as molecular data and immature morphological taxonomy.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
ADAMS, D., COLLYER, M. L. & KALIONTZOPOULOU, A., 2018.– Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses.– R package version 3.0.6.
ANDERSON, M. J., 2001.– A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance.– Austral Ecology, 26(1): 32-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
BAI, Y., BIN MA, L., XU, S. & WANG, G., 2015.– A geometric morphometric study of the wing shapes of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from the Qinling Mountains and adjacent regions: An environmental and distance-based consideration.– Florida Entomologist, 98(1): 163-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0128
BARANIAK, E., 2007.– Taxonomic revision of the genus Plutella Schrank, 1802 (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) from the Palaearctic region with notes on its phylogeny.– Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 76 (Supplement): 1-122.
BECHYNÉ, J. & BECHYNÉ, B., 1970.– Consideraciones sobre la Ley de Maulik (Coleoptera: Phytophaga).– Actas IV Congreso Latinoamericano de Zoología pp. 669-682.
BOOKSTEIN, F. 1991.– Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and Biology: 435 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511573064
CAÑAS-HOYOS, N., MÁRQUEZ, E. J. & SALDAMANDO-BENJUMEA, C. I., 2014.– Differentiation of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) corn and rice strains from Central Colombia: a wing morphometric approach.– Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107(3): 575-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/AN12154
CHACKO, J. & NARAYANASAMY, P., 2002.– Morphological characteristics of five diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) populations.– In A. A. KIRK & D. BORDAT (eds.). Improving biocontrol of Plutella xylostella: pp. 147-152. Proceedings of the International Symposium. Montpellier, France, 21-24 October 2002. CIRAD, USDA-ARS. CIRAD, Montpellier.
COLLYER, M. L., SEKORA, D. J. & ADAMS, D. C., 2015.– A method for analysis of phenotypic change for phenotypes described by high dimensional data.– Heredity, 115(4): 357-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2014.75
FERREIRA, W., 2014.– Padrões de variação morfológica nas asas de Sphingidae (Lepidoptera: Bombycoidea): efeitos alométricos, filogenéticos e dimorfismo sexual: 67 pp. [Master Dissertation] University of Brasilia, Brasilia.
FRANCOY, T. M., WITTMANN, D., DRAUSCHKE, M., MÜLLER, S., STEINHAGE, V., BEZERRA-LAURE, M., DE JONG, D. & GONÇALVES, L. S., 2008.– Identification of Africanized honey bees through wing morphometrics: two fast and efficient procedures.– Apidologie, 39(5): 488-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2008028
FRANCOY, T. M., WITTMANN, D., STEINHAGE, V., DRAUSCHKE, M., MÜLLER, S., CUNHA, D. R., NASCIMIENTO, A. M., FIGUEIREDO, V. L. C., SIMÕES, Z. L .P., DE JONG, D., ARIAS, M. C. & GONÇALVES, L. S., 2009.– Morphometric and genetic changes in a population of Apis mellifera after 34 years of Africanization.– Genetics and Molecular Research, 8(2): 709-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/vol8-2kerr019
FRANCOY, T. M., GRASSI, M. L., IMPERATRIZ-FONSECA, V. L., MAY-ITZÁ, W. & QUEZADA-EUÁN, J. J., 2011.– Geometric morphometrics of the wing as a tool for assigning genetic lineages and geographic origin to Melipona beecheii (Hymenoptera: Meliponini).– Apidologie, 42(4): 499-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-011-0013-0
JANSSEN, K., REINEKE, A. SHEIRS, J. A., ZEBITZ, C. P. W. & HECKEL, D. G., 2008.– A host shift of diamondback moth from crucifers to peas: life history traits and genetic mechanisms.– In A. M. SHELTON, H. L. COLLINS & Y. ZHANG (eds.). The management of Diamondback Moth and other crucifer pest: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop, Beijing 2006: pp. 55-62. Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing.
JERATTHITIKUL, E., YAGO, M. & HIKIDA, T., 2014.– Sexual dimorphism and intraspecific variation in wing size and shape of Tongeia fischeri (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae).– Entomological Science, 17(3): 342-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12068
JURIC, I., SALZBURGER, W. & BALMER, O., 2017.– Spread and global population structure of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and its larval parasitoids Diadegma semiclausum and Diadegma fenestrale (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) based on mtDNA.– Bulletin of Entomological Research, 107(2): 155-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485316000766
JUSTUS, K. A. & MITCHELL, B. K., 1999.– Reproductive morphology, copulation, and inter-populational variation in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).– International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 28(3): 233-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7322(99)00027-6
KARIYAWASAN, T., 2018.– Taxonomy, distribution and pest status of Plutella species (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Australia and New Zealand: 123 pp. [Master Dissertation] Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.
KHAGHANINIA, S., MOHAMMADI, S. A., SARAFRAZI, A. M., IRANINE, K. & ZAHIRI, R., 2011.– Geometric morphometrics study on geographic dimorphism of codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from north west of Iran.– Vestnik Zologii, 45(5): 20-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10058-011-0028-z
KHIABAN, N. G. M. Z., IRANI, K. H., HEJAZI, M. S., MOHAMMADI, S. A. & SOKHANDAN, N., 2010.– A geometric morphometric study of the host populations of the Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in some parts of Iran.– Munis Entomology & Zoology, 5(1): 140-147.
LANDRY, J.F. & HEBERT, P., 2013.– Plutella australiana (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), an overlooked diamondback moth revealed by DNA barcodes.– ZooKeys, 327: 43-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.327.5831
MÁRQUEZ, E., JARAMILLO, O. N., GÓMEZ-PALACIO, A. & DUJARDIN, J. P., 2011.– Morphometric and molecular differentiation of a Rhodnius robustus-like form from R. robusts Larousse 1927 and R. prolixus Stal 1859 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae).– Acta Tropica, 120(1): 103-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.06.009
MARSTELLER, S., ADAMS, D. C., COLLYER, M. L. & CONDON, M., 2009.– Six cryptic species on a single species of host plant: morphometric evidence for possible reproductive character displacement.– Ecological Entomology, 34(1): 63-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01047.x
MOZZAFFARIAN, F., SARAFRAZI, A., NOURI, G, & ARIANA, A., 2007.– Morphological variation among Iranian populations of the Carob Moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Zeller 1839) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).– Zoology in the Middle East, 41(1): 81-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2007.10638230
PERRARD, A., BAYLAC, M., CARPENTER, J. M. & VILLEMANT, C., 2014.– Evolution of wing shape in hornets: why is the wing venation efficient to species identification?.-Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27(12): 2665-2675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12523
PICHON, A., ARVANITAKIS, L., ROUX, O., KIRK, A., ALAUZET, C., BORDAT, D. & LEGAL, L., 2006.– Genetic differentiation among various populations of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae).– Bulletin of Entomological Research, 96(2): 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BER2005409
PZRZYBYTOWICZ, L., PNIAK, M. & TOFILSKI, A., 2015.– Semiautomatic identification of European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).– Journal of Economic Entomology, 190(1): 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov300
R CORE TEAM, 2018.– R: A language and environment for statistical computing.– R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.– Available from https://www.R-project.org/.
ROBINSON, G. S. & SATTLER, K., 2001.– Plutella in the Hawaiian Islands: relatives and host-races of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).– Bishop Museum Occasional Papers, 67: 1-27.
ROGGERO, A. & PASSERIN, P., 2005.– Geometric morphometric analysis of wings variation of two populations of Scythris obscurella species-group: geographic or interspecific differences? (Lepidoptera: Scythrididae).– SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, 33(130): 101-112.
ROHLF, F. J. 2010.– Tpsdig Version 2.16.– Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.
ROUX, O., GEVREY, M., ARVANITAKIS, L., GERS, C., BORDAT, D. & LEGAL, L., 2007.– ISSR-PCR: Tool for discrimination and genetic structure analysis of Plutella xylostella populations native from different geographical areas.– Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43(1): 240-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.017
SALINAS, P. J. 1986.– Studies on diamondback moth in Venezuela with reference to other Latinamerican countries.– In: Diamondback Moth Management. Proceedings of the First International Workshop: pp. 17-24. Tainan, Taiwan, 11-15 March, 1985. Shanhua, Taiwan: Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center.
SUBRAMANIAN, S. & LÖEHR, B., 2006.– Is the diamonback moth a polyphagous pest? Some thoughts about its host range expansion to pea.– In Management of Diamondback Moth and other crucifer insect pests: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop: pp. 63-71. Beijing, China.
SWIFT, M. L., 1997.– GraphPad prism, data analysis, and scientific graphing.– Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 37(2): 411-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ci960402j
TALEKAR, N. S. & SHELTON, A. M., 1993.– Biology, ecology and management of the Diamondback Moth.– Annual Reviews of Entomology, 38(1): 275–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001423
VILLEMANT, C., SIMBOLOTTI, G. & KENIS, M., 2007.– Discrimination of Eubazus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) sibling species using geometric morphometrics analysis of wing venation.– Systematic Entomology, 32(4): 625-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00389.x
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2020 A. Moreno, A. Viloria
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
L'autore mantiene i suoi diritti di marchio e di brevetto su qualsiasi processo o procedura contenuta nell'articolo.
L'autore conserva il diritto di condividere, distribuire, eseguire e comunicare pubblicamente l'articolo pubblicato su SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, con il riconoscimento iniziale della sua pubblicazione su SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
L'autore conserva il diritto di pubblicare successivamente il suo lavoro, dall'utilizzo dell'articolo alla pubblicazione in un libro, a condizione che ne indichi la pubblicazione iniziale su SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Ogni invio a SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología deve essere accompagnato dall'accettazione del copyright e dal riconoscimento della paternità. Accettandoli, gli autori mantengono il copyright del loro lavoro e accettano che l'articolo, se accettato per la pubblicazione da SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, sarà concesso in licenza d'uso e distribuzione con licenza "Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale" (CC BY 4.0), che consente a terzi di condividere e adattare il contenuto per qualsiasi scopo dando adeguato credito all'opera originale.
È possibile consultare la versione informativa e il testo legale testo legale della licenza qui. L'indicazione della Licenza CC BY 4.0 deve essere esplicitamente indicata in questo modo quando necessario.
A partire dal 2022, il contenuto della versione cartacea e digitale è concesso in licenza d'uso e distribuzione "Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale" (CC BY 4.0), che consente a terzi di condividere e adattare il contenuto per qualsiasi scopo dando adeguato credito all'opera originale.
I contenuti precedenti della rivista sono stati pubblicati con una licenza di copyright tradizionale; tuttavia, l'archivio è disponibile ad accesso libero.
Quando si utilizzano i contenuti di SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología pubblicati prima dell'anno 2022, comprese figure, tabelle o qualsiasi altro materiale in formato cartaceo o elettronico, gli autori degli articoli devono ottenere l'autorizzazione del titolare del copyright. Le responsabilità legali, finanziarie e penali a questo riguardo appartengono all'autore o agli autori.
In applicazione del Principio di Priorità del Codice Internazionale di Nomenclatura Zoologica, non è consentito depositare in archivi, siti web personali o simili, versioni diverse da quella pubblicata dall'editore.