Rhopalocera in modified landscape: The Mizoram University Campus, Aizawl, Mizoram, India (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.904Mots-clés :
Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Rhopalocera, survey, biodiversity, conservation, habitat, IndiaRésumé
A survey for the diversity of Rhopalocera at the Mizoram University (MZU) campus was carried out in selected areas with different habitat types. Pollard walks sampling method was adopted, and 16 randomly selected permanent line transects were established in three different sites. The length of the studied transacts was 500 m and the breadth was a region covered by visual observation on both sides from the point of observation along the length. Survey was carried out during September to November 2016 and from February to May 2017. A total of 3,618 individuals of 78 species of these insects belonging to six families were recorded. Maximum number of species recorded belonged to the family Nymphalidae while the family Riodinidae is represented by one species only. Three rare species namely, Parthenos sylvia (Cramer, 1775), Elymnias patna (Westwood, 1851), and Tanaecia lepidea (Butler, 1868) were also recorded. Another consequential aspect in this study is the record of Euploea midamus (Linnaeus, 1758), Castalius rosimon (Fabricius, 1775), Jamides allectus (Grose-Smith, 1894), Euploea mulciber (Cramer, [1777]), and Polytremis discreta (Elwes & Edwards, 1897), which are categorized into different conservation schedules of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972 with amendment made in 2022. Nymphalidae is the most diverse (H = 3.295) and dominant species (D = 22.727) while evenness is highest for the family Pieridae (E = 0.973) and diversity, dominance, and evenness (H = 1.818, D = 5.646, E = 0.826) is least for the family Lycaenidae. This study manifest that the modified habitats are also important repository for biodiversity which also need attention for conservation
Téléchargements
Références
Barua, K. K. (2007). Diversity and habitat selection of Papilionidae in a protected forest reserve in Assam, Northeast India. [Ph. D. Thesis] Georg-August University.
Bora, A., & Meitei, L. R. (2014). Diversity of butterflies (Order: Lepidoptera) in Assam University Campus and its vicinity, Cachar district, Assam, India. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Science, 5(3), 328-339
Courtney, S. P (1986). The ecology of Pieridae butterfly: Dynamics and Interaction. Advances in Ecology Research, 15, 51-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60120-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60120-8
De Vries, P. J. (1987). The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
De Vries, P. J. (1997). The Butterflies of Costa Rica and Their Natural History: Riodinidae (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press.
Evans, W. H. (1932). The identification of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society Publication.
Eswaran, R., & Pramod, P. (2005). Structure of butterfly community of Anaikatty hills, Western Ghats. Zoo’s Print, 20, 1939-1942. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1330.1939-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1330.1939-42
Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487-515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Fernández, I. C., & Simonetti, J. A. (2013). Small mammal assemblages in fragmented shrub lands of urban areas of Central Chile. Urban Ecosystems, 16, 377-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0272-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0272-1
Ghosh, S. K., & Majumder, M. (2007). Fauna of Mizoram (Insecta: Lepidoptera). State Fauna Series, 14, 399-412.
Gogoi, M. J. (2012). Butterflies (Lepidoptera) of Dubang valley, Mishmi hills, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 4(12), 3137-3160. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2975.3137-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2975.3137-60
Gupta, I. J. ( 2007). Fauna of Mizoram (Insecta: Lepidoptera). State Fauna Series, 14, 427-453.
Gupta, I. J., & Maulik, D. R. (2007). Fauna of Mizoram (Insetca: Lepidoptera). State Fauna Series, 14, 413-426.
Guthula,V. B., Shroyriya, S., Nigam, P., Goyal, S. P., Mohan, D., & Habib, B. (2022). Biodiversity significance of small habitat patches: More than half of Indian birds’ species are in academic campuses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 228, 104552-104565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104552
Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., & Townshend, J. R. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052
Hossain, M. A., & Ahmad, A. (2017). Livelihood status of hill dwellers in Bandarban, Bangladesh. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 3(1), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.18801/ijbmsr.030117.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18801/ijbmsr.030117.18
Kehimkar, I. (2008). The Book of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society Publication.
Khanal, B., Chalise, M. K., & Solanki, G. S. (2013). Threatened butterflies of Central Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 5(11), 4612-4615. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2825.4612-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2825.4612-5
Kocher, S. D., & Williams, E. H. (2000). The diversity and abundance of North American butterflies vary with habitat disturbance and geography. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00454.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00454.x
Kunte, K. J. (1997). Seasonal patterns in butterfly abundance and species diversity in four tropical habitats in northern Western Ghats. Journal of Biosciences, 22, 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02703397
Krishnakumar, N., Kumaraguru, A., Thiyagesan, K., & Asokan S. (2007). Diversity of papilionid butterflies in the Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, Southern India. Tiger Paper, 35, 1-8.
Lalchhuanawma (2008). Ecological studies on plant diversity and productivity of herbaceous species in Mizoram university campus at Tanhril, Aizawl, Mizoram (N. E. India). [Ph. D. Thesis]. Mizoram University.
Lalthafamkima, K. (2017). Study on diversity of spiders inside Mizoram University campus, Aizawl, Mizoram. [M. Sc.]. Mizoram University.
Liu, J., Yu, M., Tomlinson, K., & Slik, J. W. F. (2017). Patterns and drivers of plant biodiversity in Chinese university campuses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.008
Liu, J., Zhao, Y., Feng, G., Slik, F., & Zhang, J. (2021). University campuses as valuable resources for urban biodiversity and conservation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 64, 127255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127255
Mazumdar, K., Soud, R. & Gupta, A. (2011). Mammalian diversity of degraded forest habitats around Assam University Campus, Cachar, Assam, India, with notes on conservation status. Our Nature 9, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.3126/on.v9i1.5742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/on.v9i1.5742
Nerlekar, A. N., Warudkar, A. M., Gowande, G. G., Salve, S. S., Raut, A. S., Patankar, R., & Nalavade, S. B. (2016). A review of the faunal diversity of the Fergusson College campus, Pune, India. Zoo’s Prints, 29(10), 4-25.
Opdam, P., Verboom, J. & Pouwels, R. (2003). Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 18, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024429715253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024429715253
Pielou, E. C. (1969). An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley, New York.
Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. M., & Martins, I. S. (2012). Global biodiversity change: The bad, the good, and the unknown. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevenviron-042911-093511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511
Pollard, E., & Yates, T. J. (1993). Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation: The British Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. Chapman and Hall.
Saikia, M. K. (2014). Diversity of tropical butterflies in urban altered forest at Gauhati University campus, Jalukbari, Assam. Journal of Global Bioresources, 3(2), 452-463.
Sailo, L., Solanki, G. S., & Lalhruaizela, C. (2019). Avian diversity in Mizoram University Campus, Aizawl, Mizoram. Science and Technology Journal, 7(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.22232/stj.2019.07.01.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22232/stj.2019.07.01.08
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(4), 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
Singh, A. P. (2010). Butterfly diversity in tropical moist deciduous sal forests of Ankua Reserve Forest, Koina Range, Saranda Division, West Singhbhumi District, Jharkhand, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 2(9), 1130-1139. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2274.1130-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2274.1130-9
Swinhoe, C. (1905-1910). Lepidoptera Indica (Part VII). Reeve & Co. Ltd.
Talbot, G. (1947). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma: Butterflies (Vol. II). Taylor and Francis.
Teegalapalli, K., Gopi, G. V., & Samal, P. K. (2009). Forest recovery following shifting cultivation: an overview of existing research. Tropical Conservation Science, 2(4), 374-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008290900200401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008290900200401
The Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Natraj Publishers.
Vallejo, B., Aloya, A., Ong, P., Tamino, A., & Villasper, J. (2008). Spatial patterns of bird diversity and abundance in an urban tropical landscape: The University of the Philippines Diliman campus. Science Diliman, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.54645/IPYZ58175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54645/IPYZ58175
Vanlalhlimpuia (2012). Diversity of herpetofauna in Mizoram University campus, Aizawl, Mizoram. [M. Sc.]. Mizoram University.
Varshney, R. K., & Smetacek, P. (eds). (2015). A Synopsis Catalogue of the Butterflies of India. Bhimtal and Indinov Publishing.
Voon, A. M., Nasradhi, K. A., Rahman, M. A., & Azlan, J. M. (2014). Bird diversity, density, and foraging activities in a university campus landscape in Sarawak. Borneo Journal of Resources Science and Technology, 4(2), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.33736/bjrst.232.2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/bjrst.232.2014
Wintle, B. A., Kujala, H., Whitehead, A., Cameron, A., Veloz, S., Kukkala, A., & Bekessy, S. A. (2018). Global synthesis of conservation studies reveals the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(3), 909-914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813051115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813051115
Yadav, P. K. (2013). Slash-and-burn agriculture in north-east India. Expert Opinion in Environment and Biology, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi. org/10.4172/2325-9655.1000102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9655.1000102
Zothansangi, C., Ruati, V. L., Senthil, K. S. N., Gurusubramanian, G., & Lalremsanga, H. T. (2018). A preliminary survey of butterfly diversity in Dampa Tiger Reserve of Mizoram, Northeast India. Conference: Issues and Trends of Wildlife Conservation in Northeast India 2014. Mizoram University. Zoological Survey of India (2007). Fauna of Mizoram. State Fauna Series, 14, 692.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
L'auteur conserve ses droits de marque et de brevet sur tout procédé ou procédure figurant dans l'article.
L'auteur conserve le droit de partager, distribuer, exécuter et communiquer publiquement l'article publié dans SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, avec une reconnaissance initiale de sa publication dans SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
L'auteur conserve le droit de procéder à une publication ultérieure de son travail, de l'utilisation de l'article à sa publication dans un livre, à condition d'indiquer sa publication initiale dans le SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Chaque soumission à SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología doit être accompagnée d'une acceptation des droits d'auteur et de la mention de la paternité. En les acceptant, les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur de leur travail et acceptent que l'article, s'il est accepté pour publication par le SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, soit autorisé à être utilisé et distribué sous une licence "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" (CC BY 4.0) ce qui permet une utilisation, une distribution et une reproduction sans restriction sur tout support, à condition que l'auteur et la source originale soient mentionnés.
Vous pouvez lire ici les informations de base et le texte légal de la licence. L'indication de la licence CC BY 4.0 doit être expressément mentionnée de cette manière lorsque cela est nécessaire.
À partir de 2022, le contenu de la version imprimée et numérique est soumis à une licence d'utilisation et de distribution "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" (CC BY 4.0), ce qui permet une utilisation, une distribution et une reproduction sans restriction sur tout support, à condition que l'auteur et la source originale soient mentionnés.
Le contenu antérieur de la revue a été publié sous une licence de droit d'auteur traditionnelle; toutefois, les archives sont disponibles en libre accès.
Lors de l'utilisation du contenu de SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología publié avant l'année 2022, y compris les figures, les tableaux ou tout autre matériel sous forme imprimée ou électronique appartenant aux auteurs des articles, les auteurs doivent obtenir l'autorisation du détenteur des droits d'auteur. Les responsabilités légales, financières et pénales à cet égard incombent à l'auteur ou aux auteurs.
En application du Principe de Priorité du Code international de nomenclature zoologique, aucune autre version que celle publiée par l'éditeur ne peut être déposée dans des dépôts, des sites web personnels ou similaires.
