Habitat preference of Geometridae species in Western Black Sea region of Turkey (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.496Keywords:
Lepidoptera, Geometridae, habitat, similarity, Black Sea, TurkeyAbstract
In this study, 3399 specimens belonging to 188 species of the Geometridae (Lepidoptera) family were examined. Species composition and abundance rates of Geometridae communities were analyzed with respect to the plant formations of the region as deciduous forests, dry coniferous-oak forests, humid coniferous forests, pseudomaquis and farmlands. The results also indicates that 26 species in deciduous forests, 23 species in coniferous-oak forests, 20 species in humid coniferous forests, 20 in pseudomaquis and 20 species in farmlands have high abundance rate. The highest rates of abundance in deciduous forests and dry coniferous-oak forests belong to Cyclophora linearia (Hübner, [1799]) with 14,7% and Peribatodes rhomboidaria ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) 13,1%, respectively. Also, the highest rates of abundance in humid coniferous forests and pseudomaquis belong to Scotopteryx moeniata (Scopoli, 1763) with 23,46% and Cyclophora puppillaria (Hübner, [1799]) with 19,83%. Species richness is much higher in deciduous forests than it is in other habitats. Faunal similarities between the Geometridae communities are reported below 50% among all habitats. The highest faunal similarity was found to be between dry coniferous-oak forests followed by the second highest similarity between pseudomaquis and deciduous forests.
Downloads
References
AKBULUT, S., YÜKSEL, B. & KETEN, A., 2003.– The Lepidoptera (Insecta) fauna of Düzce province, Turkey.– Turkish Journal of Zoology, 27: 257-268.
AKKUZU, E., EROL, S., DINGILOG˘ LU, E., ÖZDIKMENLI, G. & AYBERK, H., 2015.– Lepidoptera Fauna of the Forest Enterprise Directorate of Kastamonu.– Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 15(2) 308-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17475/kuofd.33631
AKMAN, Y., 1990.– Climate and Bioclimate: 320 pp. Palme Press, Ankara.
AKMAN, Y., 1993.– Biogeography: 380 pp. Palme Press, Ankara.
ATALAY, I., 1994.– Vegetation Geography of Turkey: 352 pp. Ege University Press, Bornova, Izmir.
AYDINÖZÜ D., 2008.– An investigation on the distribution areas of the maquis formation in Turkey.– Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(1): 207-220.
BECK, J., SCHULZE, C., LINSENMAIR, K. E. & FIEDLER, K., 2002.– From forest to farmland: diversity of geometrid moths along two habitat gradients on Borneo.– Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17: 33-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740200202X
BESHKOV, S., 2013.– Treasures of the Congress center and its surroundings-species and habitats.– XVIII European Congress of Lepidopterology: 26-27. Blagoevgrad. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22233/20412495.0913.26
BREHM, G., 2002.– Diversity of geometrid moths in a montane rainforest in Ecuador (Doctoral dissertation). University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth. Available from http://opus.ub.uni-bayreuth.de/volltexte/2003/20 (accessed 22th June 2011).
CAN, F., 2008.– The Geometrid Moths (Lepidoptera) from the Middle and Eastern Black Sea regions of Turkey.– Turkish Journal of Zoology, 32: 351-358.
DAPKUS, D., 2004.– Lepidoptera of a raised bog and adjacent forest in Lithuania.– European Journal of Entomology, 101: 63-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2004.014
DEMIRÖRS, M. & KURT, F., 2005.– Contrubutions to the flora of the region among Zonguldak - Karabük and Bartın.– Kastamonu Education Journal, 13(2) 555-560.
GÜNAL, N., 2013.– The Effects of the Climate on the Natural Vegetation in Turkey.– Acta Turcıca, Online Thematic Journal of Turkic Studies, 5(1): 1-22.
HAUSMANN, A. & VIIDALEPP, J., 2012.– Larentiinae I.– In A. HAUSMANN. The Geometrid Moths of Europe, 3: 743 pp. Apollo Books, Stenstrup.
HAUSMANN, A., 2001.– Introduction, Archiearinae, Orthostixinae, Desmobathrinae, Alsophilinae, Geometrinae.– In A. HAUSMANN. The Geometrid Moths of Europe, 1: 282 pp. Apollo Books, Stentrup. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322547_018
HAUSMANN, A., 2004.– Sterrhinae.– In A. HAUSMANN. The Geometrid Moths of Europe, 2: 600 pp. Apollo Books, Stenstrup. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322554
MCALEECE, N., 1997.– BioDiversity Pro: Free Statistics Software for Ecology. The Natural History Museum and Scottish Association for Marine Science, London.
MIRONOV, V., 2003.– Larentiinae II. Perizomini and Eupitheciini.– In A. HAUSMANN. The Geometrid Moths of Europe, 4: 664 pp. Appollo Books, Stenstrup. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004308633
OKYAR, Z., 2012.– Heteroceran (Lepidoptera) fauna of western black sea region.– Trakya University Jounal of Natural Sciences, 13(1): 1-14.
OKYAR, Z., YURTSEVER, S., AKTAÇ, N. & ÇAKAN, G., 2009.– Some Aspects of the moth (Lepidoptera, Heterocera) species diversity in Western Black Sea Region of Turkey.– North-Western Journal of Zoology, 5(1): 104-120.
ÖZDEMIR, M. & SEVEN, S., 2007.– Interrelation Between Some Butterflies and Plant Associations (Turkey).– Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(1): 112-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.112.116
SCOBLE, M. & HAUSMANN, A., 2007.– Online list of valid and available names of the Geometridae of the World. Available from http://lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species_checklists.php (accessed 5th March 2019).
SEVEN, S., 2017.– Comparative Analysis of Habitat Preferences of the Diurnal Lepidoptera of Tuz Lake, Turkey.– Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 69(1): 49-54.
SKOU, P. & SIHVONEN, P., 2015.– Ennominae I. In A. HAUSMANN. The Geometrid Moths of Europe, 5: 657 pp. Brill, Leiden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004265738
SKOU, P., 1986.– The Geometroid moths of North Europe (Lepidoptera: Drepanidae and Geometridae).– Entomonograph, 6: 348 pp. E. J. Brill, Scandinavian Science Press, Leiden.
TOPER KAYGIN, A., YILDIZ, Y. & AVCI, M., 2009.– Lepidoptera fauna in Bartin province, in western black sea region of Turkey.– African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(9): 815-822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9040526
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author SS retains his trademark and patent rights to any process or procedure within the article.
The author retains the right to share, distribute, perform and publicly communicate the article published in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, with initial acknowledgement of its publication in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
The author retains the right to make a subsequent publication of his work, from using the article to publishing it in a book, provided that he indicates its initial publication in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Each submission to SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología must be accompanied by an acceptance of copyright and acknowledgement of authorship. By accepting them, authors retain copyright of their work and agree that the article, if accepted for publication by SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, will be licensed for use and distribution under a "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" (CC BY 4.0) licence that allows third parties to share and adapt the content for any purpose giving appropriate credit to the original work.
You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
As of 2022, the content of the print and digital version is licensed under a "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" (CC BY 4.0), licence that allows third parties to share and adapt the content for any purpose giving appropriate credit to the original work.
Previous content in the journal was published under a traditional copyright licence; however, the archive is available for free access.
When using the contents of SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología published before 2022, including figures, tables or any other material in printed or electronic format belong to the authors of the articles, the authors must obtain the permission of the copyright holder. Legal, financial and criminal liabilities in this respect belong to the author(s).
In application of the Principle of Priority of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, no other version than the one published by the publisher may be deposited in repositories, personal websites or similar.
