Description of one new species and one newsubspecies of Nymphalidae from Angola(Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)
Descripción de una especie y una subespecie nuevas de Nymphalidae de Angola (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)
Descrição de uma espécie e uma subespécie nova de Nymphalidae de Angola (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)
Description of one new species and one newsubspecies of Nymphalidae from Angola(Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea)
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, vol. 45, no. 178, pp. 227-236, 2017
Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología
Received: 08 August 2016
Accepted: 10 November 2016
Published: 30 June 2017
Abstract: The present paper deals with the description of a new species of Euphaedra (Euphaedrana)(Limenitidinae) of the “preussi-group” from northern Angola, and of a new subspecies of Acraea (Acraea) violarum Boisduval, 1847 (Heliconiinae) of the “violarum-group”, from the western and central area of the country; they are compared with the most similar known taxa.
Keywords: Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Nymphalidae, Euphaedra, Acraea, new taxa, Angola.
Resumen: En la presente contribución, se describe una especie nueva de Euphaedra(Euphaedrana) (Limenitidinae) del “grupo-preussi” del norte de Angola y una subespecie nueva de Acraea (Acraea) violarum Boisduval, 1847 (Heliconiinae) del “grupo-violarum”, del centro y oeste del país; se les compara con los taxa más parecidos.
Palabras clave: Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Nymphalidae, Euphaedra, Acraea, nuevos taxa, Angola.
Resumo: Na presente contribuição descrevem-se una espécie nova de Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) (Limenitidinae) do “grupo-preussi” do norte de Angola e uma subespécie nova de Acraea (Acraea) violarum Boisduval, 1847 (Heliconiinae) do “grupo-violarum”, do centro e oeste do país; são comparadas com os taxa mais parecidos.
Palavras-chave: Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Nymphalidae, Euphaedra, Acraea, novos taxa, Angola.
Introduction
One new species of Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) part of the “preussi-group”, the most diverse in the genus, is described from the northern Angolan riparian forest of the Loge River and is compared with the other known taxa of this lineage.
One new subspecies of Acraea (Acraea) violarum Boisduval, 1847 of the “violarum-group”, formerly known from Angola as a morph, is also described. It ranges along western and central Angola, in the Benguela, Bié, Cunene, Huambo and Huila provinces and remains completely isolated from the other studied samples of the species, reported from the Cape and from East Africa.
Methodologies
The following abbreviations will be used along the text, as follows: BS: Bivar de Sousa collection; CDR: Congo Democratic Republic (= Congo Kinshasa, = Zaire, = Belgian Congo); CZ: Former Centro de Zoologia of the IICT; EAU: Mission of the Estudos Apícolas do Ultramar of the CZ; FW: Forewing; HW: Hindwing; IICT: Former Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, now integrated in the MUHNAC; MUHNAC: Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência / Museus da Universidade de Lisboa; MB: Museu Bocage, the old name of the zoological department of the then Museu Nacional de História Natural, in Lisbon, and that (almost) completely burned during a fire the 28th March 1978; NA: Nozolino de Azevedo personal collection; nn: no registration number; PC: Collected by Passos de Carvalho; R: recto or dorsum or dorsal wing surface; V: ventral or under wing surface; WL: wing length.
All the original registration numbers were maintained. The specimens registered with a number beginning by BS or by PC were part of the personal entomological collections of respectively, Bivar de Sousa and Passos de Carvalho.
The wing length of the studied specimens was measured with an Etalon clipper, always along the FW outer margin, from its apex to the anterior insertion on the thorax; only exceptionally it doesn’t concern the left wing.
The approximate coordinates of the localities from where the studied specimens proceed are listed behind; they are close to the assigned towns/villages and were in their majority previously presented by MENDES et al. (2013). When the name of a locality has changed or when it appears wrongly spelt in previous contributions or labels, the old or the incorrect name will be remitted to the new or to the corrected one. Each locality is assigned to the recent administrative province it belongs to, as well as its approximate latitude, longitude and altitude above sea level in meters.
Taxonomy
LIMENITIDINAE Genus Euphaedra Hübner, [1819] Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) uigensis Bivar-de-Sousa & Mendes, sp. n. (Figs. 1, 2, 3 y 4)
Material examined: Holotype: ANGOLA, UIGE, Inga, near the Vale do Loge colonial settlement, October 1964, 1 (BS-16154, MUHNAC). Remaining specimens: ANGOLA, UIGE, Inga, near the Vale do Loge colonial settlement, November 1964, 1 , allotype (BS-16155, MUHNAC), October 1964, 1 , paratype (BS-16156, MUHNAC), November 1964, 1 , paratype (BS-16158, MUHNAC). December 1964, 1 , paratype (BS-16157, MUHNAC).
Description: WL: male: 38 mm; female: 49-51 mm. Male and female with quite similar colour and pattern, R black and golden-green, V light yellowish-brown; thorax and abdomen devoid of metallic spots. FW pre-apical band white, with a light greenish tint, not especially wide and more or less parallel- sided; most external spot shorter and rounder than the preceding one, this one usually more elongated, their inner border defining a more or less clear indentation. Greenish area of the FWR restricted to spaces 1a and 1b (male) or 1a, 1b and 2 (female), being in this last one more or less widened - only exceptionally it extends to the base of the cell. HWR submarginal blackish band not much enlarged, with small light greenish dots. V without special characteristics: cell spots absent or if present, light and usually small, 0-3 on the FW cell, 0-1 on the HW cell; space 7 white and conspicuous; submarginal dots white, round (male) or, if existing, more elongate and with a few inner greyish scales (female); poorly distinct white post-distal markings on spaces 3-4 and 5.
Discussion: The “preussi-group” is considered by HECQ (1997, 1999) to integrate almost 30 species and subspecies, and it is characterized by the white or very light and usually well marked HWV space 7 and the often metallic D; in most of the species, the FWR cell is completely black and in many cases the sexual dimorphism is conspicuous; main differences between the species concern, further, the R and V ground-colour, the shape of the FW pre-apical light band and the development of each one of its unities, as well as the HWV pattern. The group’s highest biodiversity seems to correspond to the CDR, mainly to the Shaba area. E. uigensis sp. n. may be distinguished from the remaining known species of the “preussi-group” as follows:
E. paradoxa Neave, 1904 from Kenya is quite unique, taking into account its reddish R and because there is no distinctive light band on the HWV space 7.
E. overlaeti Hulstaert, 1926, from CDR and northern Zambia is also distinct due to the uniform violet R, the poorly developed light FWR pre-apical band and the almost inexistent HWV light space 7.
In E. niveovittata Aurivillius, 1903, known from Shaba (CDR), while the R may be whitish-green or ochreous, the FWD pre-apical white band is quite different, with the outer spot reduced and round and the HWV space 7 dark orange; further, all the V round black cell spots are large and clear on both wings.
E. neumanni Rothschild & Jordan, 1902, exclusive from Ethiopia is also immediately distinguished due to its quite unique V, with whitish FW margin and an ill-defined white HW space 7, which isprolonged by a longitudinal irregular whitish band.
E. miranda Hecq, 1984, from Cameroon, CAR and northern CDR is also distinct due to the ochreous or ochreous-green ground-colour and usually very wide, almost ovoid, ochreous to orange pre- apical FW light band; its HWV shows whitish bands along most of the HWV spaces.
In E. procera Hecq, 1984 from Shaba (CDR) and E. subprocera Hecq, 1984 from CDR to Uganda, the FW pre-apical band is distinct, with the outermost white spot reduced and well individualized from the remaining ones of the band; further, the R metallic ground-colour is blue, not greenish.
E. fascinata Hecq, 1984, from Cameroon, CAR, Congo and CDR, though somewhat variable, is clearly distinct from the remaining species in the group due to the quite conspicuous HWR whitish post- discal spots; further, the FWR cell is usually not black.
Several species show - usually associated to other dissimilarities - a clear chromatic sexual dimorphism, inexistent in the new E. uigensis. These are the cases of: E. illustris Talbot, 1927, from a restricted area in southern Shaba (CDR), with green male and whitish female, quite distinct from all the species in the group taking also into account, among other features, the wide and S-shaped FW pre- apical light band, the large black dots on the V cells and the HWV whitish wide submedian markings along the wings spaces. E. bergeri Hecq, 1974, also from Shaba (CDR) and also with greenish male and whitish female, has a somewhat wider pre-apical band and a much lighter V, with large FWV cell black dots. In the northern CDR E. leloupi Overlaet, 1955, the FWR is green in the male and blue in the female, the pre-apical band is thinner than in E. uigensissp. n. and the V is green, not brown; besides, at least in the male the green area of the FWR often attains the cell. Also in E. fulvofasciataHolland, 1920 from Cameroon and northern CDR, male is greenish and female bluish; its FW pre-apical band is yellow, its more external spot is more or less coma-shaped and the V shows large black cell spots. E. xerophila Hecq, 1974, from southern Kivu (eastern CDR), also with greenish male and whitish or bluish- white female, has a green strongly marked V and the black cell dots are large especially on the FW. In E. ochrovirens Hecq, 1984, mainly from Cameroon and CDR, the male is greenish (no black FWR apex) and the female whitish, the white FW pre-apical band is thin or even obsolescent and the FWR cell is usually free of black scales - so, with conspicuous black dots. E. ipassa Vande-Weghe, 2009 from eastern Gabon, described as close to E. preussi, may be distinguished from the new Angolan species with which it shares the large white spot 4 of the FW, mainly by the distinct light colour of the female D and, mainly, by the rufous V with well developed black spots on the FW and HW cells and the much darker and contrasted submarginal spots of the HWV.
E. margueritae Heqc, 1978, from the high primary forests of eastern CDR, Rwanda and Uganda, is only slightly dimorphic, with more dark greenish males and more dark bluish females, but its main diagnostic feature concerns the clearly independent white spots of the FW pre-apical white band.
Otherwise, several other species show the FW pre-apical light band conspicuously thinner than it is in the new Angolan species allowing their immediate diagnosis: this feature, alone or together with other morphological differences, is quite visible in E. albofasciata Rebel, 1914, from CAR to CDR, E. disjunta disjunta Hecq, 1984 and E. disjunta virescens Hecq, 1984, both from CDR, E. olivacea Grünberg, 1906, from Uganda, E. vicina vicinaHecq, 1984, from Cameroon to Uganda, E. vicina longinqua Hecq, 1984 from Nigeria and E. vicina pallidoides Hecq, 1984 from the Shaba (CDR).
In the somewhat variable C. preussi preussi Staudinger, 1891 known from Nigeria to East Africa and in E. preussi pallida Hecq, 1986, from Shaba (CDR), both with well developed V black cell spots, the HWR post-discal lighter spots are bluish and not much distinctive while those of the HWV are large and aureolate by blackish scales. We wander if the previous references of A. preussi from Angola (AURIVILLIUS, 1928, to the country and LADEIRO, 1956, from Calunga - material not re-examined) really belong to E. preussi.
In E. subviridis Holland, 1920, from CDR, the FW pre-apical band tends to be yellowish, mainly in the female, and its individual spots are clearly cut by the black wing nerves. Male is more green than that of E. uigensis sp. n. and the V is greenish and heavily marked with black (large cell and submarginal spots).
At last, E. mayumbensis Heqc, 1984, reported from Cameroon, Gabon, Congo and CDR, also somewhat dimorphic, with more greenish male and more whitish female, is distinct from the new Angolan endemic due to the light (white or yellowish) and externally enlarged FW pre-apical band. ACKERY et al. (1995) point it is exclusively present in the Mayumbe CDR and western CAR - Cameroon not considered.
E. cinnamomea Rotschild, 1918, from CDR is considered by HECQ (1999) as dubious and as an eventual synonym of E. castanea, but this last one is not even reported by him; it was pointed by ACKERY et al. (1995) as an E. castanea Berger, 1981 synonym and later accepted by D’ABRERA (2004) as a morph of E. castanea Rothschild, 1918 nec Berger, 1981 who presented its type-female R photo; whatever its status will be, it shows a FWR pinkish or light brown (cinnamon) ground-colour and the cell black spots are, as a rule, large and well visible.
Ecology: All the type-specimens were collected by net-sweeping on the Loge gallery-forest. The Loge River flows East-West on the south Uige and along the border between the Angolan Zaire and Bengo provinces, entering the Atlantic Ocean north from Ambriz town (northern Bengo). This forest remains unconnected to any other gallery-forests, and is completely separated from the closest ones by savanna and/or by open dry forest.
Etymology: The new species, is named after the Angolan province of Uige, due to the geographical origin of the known samples.
HELICONIINAE Genus Acraea Fabricius, 1807 Acraea (Acraea) violarum anchietai Mendes & Bivar-de-Sousa, ssp. n. (Figs. 5, 6, 7 y 8)
(= Acraea violarum f. assimiliora Le Doux, 1922)
Material examined: Holotype: ANGOLA, HUAMBO, Cuíma, XII-2015, 1 , (BS-34931, MUHNAC). Remaining specimens: ANGOLA: HUAMBO: Chianga, I-1973, 1 paratype, (PC-nn, MUHNAC); Ibid, I-1973, 1 , paratype (PC-nn, MUHNAC); Ibid, 15-I-1972, 2 , paratype (PC-nn, MUHNAC). Nova Lisboa, II-1971, 1 non-type, (NA-nn). Sacáala, Nova Lisboa, VII-1958, 1 , allotype, EAU, (CZ-3057, MUHNAC).
Description: WL: m: 22 mm; f: 23.5 mm. The main morphological feature allowing us to consider the Angolan samples as belonging to a new subspecies is the shape of each element of the HW submarginal band; indeed, while in the nominate subspecies each element is more or less round and so, the inner margin of that band is more or less regular, in A. violarum anchietai ssp. n. each one of the spots is clearly triangular in such a way that the submarginal band inner margin remains clearly toothed. The other black spots of the R and V fairly agree with those of the photos presented by D’ABRERA (1997) and PIERRE & BERNAUD (2013), certainly corresponding to specimens belonging to the eastern populations of the species though nothing is reported about their geographical origin. The new subspecies corresponds to the morph assimiliora (LE DOUX, 1922) of A. violarum, of which the male was described from “Angola” and the female from the Bailundu, a name not valid and not usable in light of article 45 of the ICNZ (2000).
Discussion: A. violarum Boisduval, 1847 belongs to the “violarum-subgroup” of the “egina- group”, the most diverse of the subgenus in Angola - named by PIERRE (1988) the “egina-supergroup”. ACKERY et al. (1955) and D’ABRERA (1997) report this species as monotypical and ranging along South Africa (Eastern Cape, Natal and Transvaal), Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Angola; it was assigned by PIERRE & BERNAUD (2013) as eventually represented by two subspecies, the nominate one from Angola, Zimbabwe and South Africa and the northernmost, smaller and lighter A. v. gracilis Wichgraf, 1909 from Zimbabwe and Mozambique.
A. violarum was assigned from Angola by AURIVILLIUS (1928, no precise location), by ELTRINGHAM (1912) who points to the species in Bihé, Calweha, Caconda, Cubal R., Cambo,Caquenje and Benguella and by LE DOUX (1922) who describes the morph assimiliora as from “Angola” and from the Bailundu; MONARD (1956) assigns the species to Kalukembé, Sangevé, Tiytunda, Bimbi and Chimporo. PIERRE (1988) describes the female sphragis and the male genitalia (specimens origin not considered) and represents in a schematic map its occurrence in Angola, though without precise information: despite the hard correspondence between the map dots and the localities from where the species was known in Angola, its scattered ranges are quite conspicuous both in Angola and in its remaining known range (Zimbabwe, Mozambique and South Africa); he reports, further, that the species is typical from “Afrique Méridionale, de l’Angola au Nyassaland jusqu’au Cap”; in his point on the phylogenetic hypothesis, he selects characters 21-24 as typical for the “violarum-group” related to the male genitalia and the sphragis morphology. The complete independence of the two areas from where the species is known is also clearly visible in the map presented by BERNAUD (2009): on one side western and central-western Angola, on the other eastern Zimbabwe, Mozambique and South Africa, with a blank corresponding to eastern Angola, Zambia, Namibia and Botswana. KOÇAK & KEMAL (2007, 2009) assigns the species to Angola without comments with natalensis (Angas, 1849) in its synonymy, and considers it is monotypical - gracilis Wichgraf, 1909 is not accepted as valid. LE DOUX (1922) presented photos of the R of the male and female of Angolan specimens he described as A. violarum f. assimiliora where it is possible to perceive themore or less acute shaped spot of the HW marginal band (Taf. 3, Figs. 4, 5)
Ecology: A. violarum is known to fly in deciduous woods and seems always uncommon. Caterpillars of the nominate subspecies are known to feed on Tryphostemma (Passifloraceae).
Etymology: The new subspecies is named in memory of José Alberto de Oliveira Anchieta (Lisbon?-Portugal, 1832 - Caconda-Angola, 1897) a Portuguese explorer that in the middle XIX century collected along Angola mainly vertebrates which were studied in Lisbon by Barboza du Bocage. His laboratory in Angola was located in Caconda.
Acknowledgements
SV was funded by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) through grant SFRH/BI/51643/2011. We remember Eng. J. Passos de Carvalho whose collection is now deposited in the MUHNAC and we deeply thank his widow, Drª M. Umbelina Passos de Carvalho for the offered material. We also remember, further, late Eng. Nozolino de Azevedo and we thank his widow Mrs Graça Azevedo and his daughter, by Isabel Azevedo, for the chance to study his personal collection. We thank further our colleague Luis Catarino, from the MUHNAC-IICT, for the loan of the camera Canon EOS.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKERY, P. R., SMITH, C. R. & VANE-WRIGHT, R. I., 1995.– Carcasson’sAfrican Butterflies. An Annotated Catalogue of the Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea of the Afrotropical Region: I-XII + 803 pp., CSIRO, Victoria.
AURIVILLIUS, C., 1928.– Les Macrolépidoptères de la Faune Éthiopienne. XIII. Diurnes Éthiopiens.– In A. SEITZ, 1928. Les Macrolépidoptères du Globe. IVe Partie, 13(4): 1-615 + 80 pl.
BERNAUD, D., 2009.– Le site des Acraea de Dominique Bernaud. Available from http://www.acraea.com
D’ABRERA, B., 1997.– Butterflies of the Afrotropical Region. Part I. Papilionidae, Pieridae, Acraeidae, Danaidae & Satyridae: xxiv + 263 pp., plates with text. Hill House Publisher, Melbourne / London.
ELTRINGHAM, H., 1912.– A monograph of the African species of the genus Acraea Fab., with a supplement of those of the Oriental Region.– Transaction of the Entomological Society of London, 1912(1): 1-374, pl. 1-16.
ICNZ, 2000.– International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th ed.: Article 45: 45.
JIU, 1969.– Carta de Angola. Levantamento Aerofotogramétrico. Junta de Investigações do Ultramar / Governo Geral de Angola. Ministério do Ultramar. Escala 1: 100 000.
KOÇAK, A. Ö. & KEMAL, N. M., 2007.– Report on the temporary results of the faunal lists of African states based upon the databank of the Cesa. 13. Angola.– Cesa Publications on African Lepidoptera, 15: 1-29.
KOÇAK, A. Ö. & KEMAL, N. M., 2009.– Third report on the temporary results of the faunal lists of African continent based upon the info-system of the Cesa. 13. Angola.– Cesa Publications on African Lepidoptera, 25: 75-119.
LADEIRO, M., 1956.– Lepidópteros de Angola - Estudo de uma colecção oferecida ao Museu Zoológico da Universidade de Coimbra-Compendium Entomologicum Angolae.– Anais da Junta de Investigações do Ultramar, 11(3): 153-172.
LE DOUX, C., 1922.– Acraean Studien I. (Lep. Rhop.). 2. Die Formenkreise von Ac. violarum Bsd. und Ac. Asema Hew.: 301-309.– Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1922(3): 297-316.
MENDES, L. F., BIVAR-DE-SOUSA, A., FIGUEIRA, R. & SERRANO, A. R. M., 2013.– Gazetteer of the Angolan localities known for beetles (Coleoptera) and butterflies (Lepidoptera; Papilionoidea).– Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia, .(14) (228): 257-290.
MONARD, A., 1956.– Compendium Entomologicum Angolae. VI - Ord. Lepidoptera.– Anais da Juna de Investigações do Ultramar, 11(III): 119-128.
PIERRE, J., 1988.– Les Acraea du super-groupe «egina»: révision et phylogénie (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae).– Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.), 24(3): 263-287.
PIERRE, J. & BERNAUD, D., 2013.– Butterflies of the World. Nymphalidae XXIII. Acraea subgenus Acraea, 39: 1- 8, pl. 1-28. Goecke & Evers, Keltern.
VANDE WEGHE, G., 2009.– Description de nouveau taxons et contribution à l’étude des Lepidoptères afrotropicaux (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Limenetidinae, Satyrinae; Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae; Lycaenidae, Theclinae).– Entomologia Africana, 14(1) supplément: 1-24.
Appendix
Author notes
Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia, Lisboa PORTUGAL.
Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência Universidade de Lisboa Rua da Escola Politécnica, Lisboa PORTUGAL.
Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vila do Conde PORTUGAL
Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vila do Conde PORTUGAL.