Artículos

Faunistic account on the Heterocera of Tirthan Valley, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area: a preliminary checklist (Insecta: Lepidoptera)

Informe faunístico sobre los Heterocera del Valle de Tirthan, Parque Nacional del Gran Himalaya área de conservación: una lista de comprobación preliminar (Insecta: Lepidoptera)

A. P. Singh
Wildlife Institute of India, India
A. Chandra
Wildlife Institute of India, India
K. De
Department of Life Sciences, Sri Sathya Sai University for Human Excellence, India
V. P. Uniyal
Wildlife Institute of India, India
R. Joshi
Zoological Survey of India, Gangetic Plains Regional Centre, India

Faunistic account on the Heterocera of Tirthan Valley, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area: a preliminary checklist (Insecta: Lepidoptera)

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, vol. 50, núm. 199, pp. 497-524, 2022

Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología

Received: 20 February 2022

Accepted: 26 March 2022

Pubshed: 30 September 2022

Abstract: The Present study represents 165 species belonging to 17 families, reported from Tirthan valley of Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area. The study was conducted in April 2018 to July 2019. Family Erebidae and Geometridae was found dominated with 45 species each followed by Crambidae 30 species. With this addition of moth species, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area is now home to 385 species of moths. The study was conducted for the first time in the Tirthan valley of Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area.

Keywords: Insecta, Lepidoptera, Heterocera, diversity, Greater Himalaya, India.

Resumen: El presente estudio representa 165 especies pertenecientes a 17 familias, registradas del Valle de Tirthan del Área de Conservación del Parque Nacional del Gran Himalaya, India. El estudio se llevó a cabo desde abril de 2018 hasta julio de 2019. Las familias Erebidae y Geometridae fueron dominantes con 45 especies cada una, seguidas por Crambidae 30 especies. Con esta adición de especies de Heterocera, el Área de Conservación del Parque Nacional del Gran Himalaya alberga ahora 385 especies. El estudio se realizó por primera vez en el Valle de Tirthan del Área de Conservación del Parque Nacional del Gran Himalaya.

Palabras clave: Insecta, Lepidoptera, Heterocera, diversidad, Gran Himalaya, India.

Introduction

Insects are the most diverse animal group present on earth and show extreme level of adaptability probably in all kinds of habitats (HARRINGTON & STORK, 1995; LANDRES et al., 1988). Lepidoptera shows second highest diversity (BENTON, 1995) and act as indicators of healthy ecosystem and human activities (KOCHER & WILLIAMS, 2000). Majority of species are dull coloured with exceptions of few members of families like Zygaenidae and Choreutidae. Lepidoptera are also economically important as members of family Bombycidae produce expensive silk. Many of the moth species feed on both living and dead decaying plant material (FRIEDRICH, 1986; PORTER, 1997; ROBINSON et al., 2001; KENDRICK, 2002; SHARMA & RAMAMURTHY, 2010). According to Srivastava, 2002 Heterocera act as an integral part of the wildlife ecosystems, indicators of environment, pollinate flowers and occupy a huge place in food web. Certain species are co-evolved with Lepidoptera pollinated flowers, these plants open their flower generally at night because of the nocturnal behaviour of many of the Heterocera, the structure of flowers are only feasible to specific species to suck nectar out of the long tubes due to the presence of long proboscis.

Heterocera are one of the main groups of insects which are well described taxonomically as well as by diversity and abundance (GHAZOUL, 2002). CHANDRA (2011) compiled data of Indian insects in which Heterocera are known through 13,359 species under 78 families. After that, many new taxa have been described and many checklists, catalogues, and books on Heterocera from India have been published (SINGH et al., 2014; KIRTI, 2015, 2016; CHANDRA et al., 2019; JOSHI et al., 2019; KIRTI et al., 2019) and it is hopeful that the number of species from India is more than that at present.

Previously very few studies have been documented the record of moth diversity from Himachal Pradesh. Various studies have documented the Heterocera from Kullu, Kangra, Dharamshala, Dharamshala (BUTLER, 1886; REV. HOCKING, 1888; MANI & SINGH, 1962; COTES & SWINHOE, 1887-1889), HAMPSON (1892-1896) in Fauna of British India, in general Himachal Pradesh (WALIA, 2005; ROSE & PATHANIA, 2004) and Chamba (SEKHON & SINGH, 2015). 17 species of Heterocera were previously reported from Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area (UNIYAL & MATHUR, 1998). Recent inventory published by ZSI (CHANDRA et al., 2019), reported 237 species of Heterocera belonging to 16 families. However, the authors skipped exploring the Tirthan valley of the Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area. With this particular aim, the study was conducted to document the moth diversity of Tirthan Valley of the conservation area.

Map represents the study locations in the Tirthan valley of Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area.
Figure 1.–
Map represents the study locations in the Tirthan valley of Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area.

Study Area

The study was performed in the Tirthan valley of Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area (GHNPCA) located in the Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh. It was established in 1984 and was added in the UNESCO list of World Heritage Sites on 23 June 2014. The National Park is spread across four valleys which include Thirthan valley, Sainj valley, Parvati valley, and Jiva Nala. It includes a total area of 1,171 km2 and an altitudinal range of between 1500 and 6000 m (Figure 1). The region is highly mountainous and covered with alpine, glacial, temperate, and subtropical forests. Seasons are broad: summer (Apr-Jun), rainy (Jul-Sep), and winter (Oct-Mar). The study was performed in six different locations of the valley (Table 1).

Table 1.–
Catalog of Heterocera of Tirthan valley, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area. MU (Mungla), KH (Kharoncha), RP (Ropa), RO (Rola), CH (Cholocha), ST (Shilt).
Catalog of Heterocera of Tirthan valley, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area. MU (Mungla), KH (Kharoncha), RP (Ropa), RO (Rola), CH (Cholocha), ST (Shilt).

Table 1.–
Catalog of Heterocera of Tirthan valley, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area. MU (Mungla), KH (Kharoncha), RP (Ropa), RO (Rola), CH (Cholocha), ST (Shilt).
Catalog of Heterocera of Tirthan valley, Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area. MU (Mungla), KH (Kharoncha), RP (Ropa), RO (Rola), CH (Cholocha), ST (Shilt).

Methods

The consolidated information from Heterocera was compiled as a result of the surveys conducted in the area from April 2018- July 2019 as a part of the Department of Science and Technology under National mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem (DST-NMSHE) research project. Light trapping was conducted in the six different regions of the valley. Mercury light trapping (160W) method was used to attract the species in different habitats of GHNPCA. No specimens were collected during these surveys and only photographs were taken by the author Amar Paul Singh. However, photographs of all the species are provided for better understanding of the wing coloration and wing maculation. Species were identified using various literature ROBINSON et al. (1994), KONONENKO & PINRATANA (2005), ZOLOTUHIN & PINRATANA (2005), SCHINTLMEISTER & PINRATANA (2007), PINRATANA & CERNY (2009), SONDHI & SONDHI (2016) and SHUBHALAXMI (2018) as well as web sources like https://www.inaturalist.org/, http://treenymph.org/wg-moths/.

Results

A total of 165 species belonging to 17 families were reported (Table 2). Family Erebidae and Geometridae was found dominated with 45 species, Crambidae 30 species and least number of species were found in Tortricidae, Uraniidae and Zygaenidae (Figure 2). 17 species similar to previous studies (CHANDRA et al., 2019) were found from Tirthan valley. A total of 147 species were reported for the first time from the conservation area. Photographs of the species were taken by Amar Paul Singh and the locality of each species is provided in Table 1.

Discussion

Due to its large latitude and high altitude, the Indian Himalayas are home to numerous biomes and habitats, which represent a central scene where different elements of biogeographic fauna are mixed. The introspection of the known diversity of Himalayan Lepidoptera is of immediate concern because of constant fluctuations in Global climate (SANYAL et al., 2018). A. G. Butler, a British entomologist described 227 species of Indian Rhopalocera in his seminal publication (1886) “On the Lepidoptera Collection in India”, a large part of which is found in the Indian Himalayas like Darjeeling, Sikkim and the north-eastern part. Walia and Anju in 2005 conducted an exclusive study of Geometridae in Chandigarh and Himachal Pradesh, reporting 184 species. CHANDRA et al. (2019) reported 237 species of Heterocera under 178 genera belonging to 45 subfamilies of 16 families from the Sainj regions of Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area. Geometridae was found most dominated with 96 species followed by Erebidae 44 species and Noctuidae 41 species in their study. Whereas in Tirthan valley we concluded that the diversity of Erebidae is comparatively high. With this Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area is home to a total of 385 species of Heterrocera. Heterocera species like are a highly diverse and ecologically important group of insect species that play numerous key roles in particular ecosystems like herbivory, prey for birds and bats, pollination, and are also potential indicators of ecosystem health and environmental fluctuations across a wide variety of landscapes (ERHARDT & THOMAS, 1991; KITCHING et al., 2000; SUMMERVILLE & CRIST, 2004). Great Himalayan National Park Conservation area representing such diversity of the Heterocera indicating a healthy ecosystem in terms of such factors.

Bar depicts the total number of genus and species of moths representing different families reported from Tirthan valley.
Figure 2.–
Bar depicts the total number of genus and species of moths representing different families reported from Tirthan valley.


















Acknowledgments

We wish to express our sincere thanks and gratitude to the Department of Science and Technology under National mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem (DST-NMSHE). We would like to thank Director, Dean, Wildlife Institute of India for providing the necessary facilities to carry out the work. Thanks are due to the Mr. Nikhil Singh Kahera for his support and assistance during the fieldwork. The authors are also thankful of Deven Mehta for providing Actias maenas photograph.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

BAZ, A., 1986.– Las mariposas de la comarca madrileña del río Henares, I. Influencia de la vegetación sobre la composición y estructura de sus comunidades.– Misccel.lània Zoològica, 10: 189-198.

BENTON, T. G., 1995.– Biodiversity and biogeography of Henderson Island insects.– Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 56(1-2): 245-259.

BUTLER, A. G., 1886.– On butterflies collected by Major Yerbury in western India.– Proceedings of Zoological Society London, 3: 355-395.

CHANDRA, K., 2011.– Fauna of Madhya Pradesh (including Chhattisgarh), State Fauna Series.– Zoological Survey of India, 15(3): 1-202.

CHANDRA, K., KUMAR, V., SINGH, N., RAHA, A. & SANYAL, A. K., 2019.– Assemblages of Lepidoptera in Indian Himalaya through Long Term Monitoring Plots: 457 pp. Published by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.

COTES, E. C. & SWINHOE, C., 1887.– A Catalogue of the Moths of India, Part 1. Sphinges: 1-40. The Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta.

COTES, E. C. & SWINHOE, C., 1889.– A Catalogue of the Moths of India, Part 5. Pyrales: 591-670. The Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta.

ERHARDT, A. & THOMAS, J. A., 1991.– Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe: 213-236.– In N. M. COLLINS & J. A. THOMAS, editors. The conservation of insects and their habitats: 468 pp. Academic Press, London.

FRIEDRICH, E., 1986.– Breeding Butterflies and Moths - A practical Handbook for British and European Species: 176 pp. Harley Books, Colchester.

GHAZOUL, J., 2002.– Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand.– Biodiversity and Conservation, 11: 521-541.

HAMPSON, G. F., 1892.– TheFauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Moths, 1: 527 pp. Taylor and Francis, London.

HAMPSON, G. F., 1896.– The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, 4: 594 pp. Taylor and Francis, London.

HARRINGTON, R. & STORK N., 1995.– Insects in a changing environment: 535 pp. Academic Press Limited, London.

JOSHI, R., SINGH, N. & LASZLO, G. M., 2019.– An updated Checklist of subfamily Nolinae (Lepidoptera, Nolidae) from India.– Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 119(3): 263-281.

KENDRICK, R. C., 2002.– Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Hong Kong: 660 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hong Kong.

KIRTI, J. S., CHANDRA, K., SAXENA, A. & SINGH, N., 2019.– Geometrid moths of India: 296 pp. Nature Books India, New Delhi.

KIRTI, J. S. & SINGH, N., 2015.– Arctiid Moths of India, 1: 214 pp. Nature Books India, New Delhi.

KIRTI, J. S. & SINGH, N., 2016.– Arctiid Moths of India, 2: 214 pp. Nature Books India, New Delhi.

KITCHING, R. L., ORR, A. G., THALIB, L., MITCHELL, H., HOPKINS, M. S. & GRAHAM, A. W., 2000.– Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest.– Journal of Applied Ecology, 37: 284-297.

KOCHER, S. D. & WILLIAMS, E. H., 2000.– The diversity and abundance of North American butterflies, vary with habitat disturbance and geography.– Journal of Biogeography, 27: 785-794.

KONONENKO, V. S. & PINRATANA, A., 2005.– Noctuidae.– Moths of Thailand, 3: 265 pp. Brothers of St. Gabriel, Thailand.

LANDRES, P. B., VERNER, J. & THOMAS, J. W., 1988.– Ecological uses of vertebrate indicators species: a critique.– Conservation Biology, 2: 316-328.

MANI, M. S. & SINGH, S., 1962.– Entomological Survey of Himalaya. Part XXVI. A Contribution to our knowledge of the Geography of the High-Altitude Insects of the Nival Zones from the North-West Himalaya.– Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 59(1): 77-99.

PINRATANA, A. & CERNY, K., 2009.– Arctiidae.– Moths of Thailand, 6: 283 pp. Brothers of St. Gabriel, Thailand, Bangkok.

PORTER, J., 1997.– The Colour Identification Guide to the Caterpillars of the British Isles. Viking: 275 pp. Harmondsworth, Middlesex.

ROBINSON, G. S., ACKERY, P. R., KITCHING, I. J., BECCALONI, G. W. & HERNANDEZ, L. M., 2001.– Hostplants of the Moth and Butterfly Caterpillars of the Oriental Region: 722 pp. Natural History Museum, London.

ROBINSON, G. S., TUCK, K. R., SHAFFER, M. & COOK, K., 1994.– The Smaller Moths of South-East Asia: 309 pp. Malaysian Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur.

ROSE, H. S., PATHANIA, P. C. & SOOD, R., 2004.– A preliminary list of hawk moths (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) from three states of North-West India.– Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 3: 197-200.

SANYAL, A. K., MALLICK, K., KHAN, S., BANDYOPADHYAY, U., MAZUMDER, A., BHATTACHARYYA, K., PATHANIA, P. C., RAHA, A. & CHANDRA, K., 2018.– Insecta: Lepidoptera (Moths): 651-726.– Faunal Diversity of Indian Himalaya: 872 pp. Zoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata.

SCHINTLMEISTER, A. & PINRATANA, A., 2007.– Notodontidae.– Moths of Thailand, 5: 320 pp. Brothers of St. Gabriel in Thailand, Bangkok.

SEKHON, C. K. & SINGH, J., 2015.– Inventory of owlet moths from Western Ghats of India (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera).– International Journal of Applied Research, 1(5): 175-181.

SHARMA, G. & RAMAMURTHY, V. V., 2010.– A checklist of Lepidopterous pests of vegetables in India: 1-14. Zoological Survey of India & Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi. Available from http://zsi.gov.in/checklist/Gaurav-Checklist.pdf (accessed January 2010.

SHUBHALAXMI, V., 2018.– Field Guide to Indian Moths: 474 pp. Birdwing Publishers (enterprise of Ladybird Environmental Consulting LLP).

SINGH, J., SINGH, N. & JOSHI, R., 2014.– A Checklist of Subfamily Arctiinae (Erebidae: Noctuoidea: Lepidoptera) from India.– Recordsof the Zoological Survey of India, 367: 1-76.

SONDHI, Y. & SONDHI, S., 2016.– A partial checklist of moths (Lepidoptera) of Dehradun, Mussoorie and Devalsari in Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.– Journal of Threatened Taxa, 8(5): 8756-8776.

SUMMERVILLE, K. S. & CRIST, T. O., 2004.– Contrasting effects of habitat quantity and quality on moth communities in fragmented landscapes.– Ecography, 27: 3-12.

UNIYAL, V. P. & MATHUR, P. K., 1998.– Diversity of butterflies in the great Himalayan national park, Western Himalaya.– Indian Journal of Forestry, 21(2): 150-155.

WALIA, V. K., 2005.– Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae (Moths): 181-190.– Fauna of Western Himalaya (Part-2): Himachal Pradesh.: 181-190.– Faunal Diversity of Indian Himalaya: 872 pp. Zoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata.

WALIA, V. K. & ANJU, D., 2005.– A new species of Chlororithra Butler from Himachal Pradesh in India, with comments on its taxonomic status (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Geometrinae).– Polskie Pismo Entomology, 74(1): 73-80.

WALSINGHAM, L., 1888.– Description of a new Genus and Species of Pyralidae received from the Rev. J. H. Hocking, from the Kangra Valley, Punjab, India.– Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 5(2): 47-52.

ZOLOTUHIN, V. V. & PINRATANA, A., 2005.– Lasiocampidae.– Moths of Thailand, 4: 205 pp. Brothers of St. Gabriel in Thailand, Bangkok.

Notas de autor

amarpaulsingh4@gmail.com

HTML generado a partir de XML-JATS4R por